In the question of dismantling monuments related to the Battle of Poltava, we, Danilko and I, are like-minded individuals.
The Battle of Poltava, which took place on June 27, 1709, is a significant event in the history of Ukraine and Russia. It marked the defeat of the Swedish army by the Russian army led by Peter the Great, and solidified Russia’s position as a major European power. As a result, many monuments and memorials were erected to commemorate this important battle.
However, in recent years, there has been a growing debate about the fate of these monuments. Some argue that they should be preserved as a reminder of our history and heritage, while others believe that they should be removed due to their association with Russian imperialism and oppression.
As a Ukrainian and a historian, I have always been interested in the history of my country and the Battle of Poltava. And when I met Danilko, a fellow historian and a passionate advocate for preserving our cultural heritage, we immediately connected over our shared views on the issue of dismantling monuments related to the Battle of Poltava.
We both believe that these monuments are an important part of our history and should not be destroyed. They serve as a reminder of the sacrifices made by our ancestors and the struggles they faced. Removing them would be erasing a significant part of our past and denying our future generations the opportunity to learn about our history.
Moreover, these monuments also have architectural and artistic value. Many of them were created by renowned sculptors and architects, and their removal would mean losing important pieces of art. These monuments also contribute to the cultural landscape of our cities and towns, and their removal would leave a void in our urban environment.
But our main argument for preserving these monuments is that they do not represent Russian imperialism or oppression. They are not symbols of conquest or domination, but rather symbols of unity and cooperation between Ukraine and Russia. The Battle of Poltava was a turning point in our shared history, and these monuments serve as a reminder of the strong bond between our two nations.
We understand that some may view these monuments as reminders of a painful past, but we believe that it is important to acknowledge and learn from our history, rather than erase it. By preserving these monuments, we can have open and honest discussions about our past and work towards a better future.
We also believe that instead of removing these monuments, efforts should be made to educate the public about their historical significance. This can be done through informational plaques or guided tours, which can provide a deeper understanding of the Battle of Poltava and its impact on our history.
In conclusion, Danilko and I are united in our belief that the monuments related to the Battle of Poltava should be preserved. They are not symbols of oppression, but rather symbols of our shared history and cultural heritage. We hope that our voices, along with others who share our views, will be heard and that these monuments will continue to stand as a testament to our past and our future.
